GBW,
There are a few examples of metal laminates out there.... Prior to elastomerics and composites, helicopters used 'packs' or 'straps' of thin stainless sheet as flexures (still do!), the H300 and H500 are perfect examples. These tension/torsion straps take all the flight loads of the rotor system and allow feathering (pitch change) of the blades.
One of the major problems with blending metal and composite is the differences in the elastic properties or bending nodes of both materials. One can handle more flexing than the other so there is a shear force within the laminates.... your 'nomorenails' would probably become brittle and crack with the numerous cycles too

. Even tension/torsion straps have a huge shear force within the packs, they use extremely thin laminates to spread the load on the mounting bolts and allow for better flexing qualities as well as redundancy....
Sorry if I sound like a 'know it all', not my intention to put anyones ideas down..... far from it. The concept is a pretty old one though, and there are positives and negatives, as mentioned above. another issue I should mention is that the design of a hub bar is far different from a rotor hub... If you use laminates, there is also a possibility that the bar will be softer in plane... as the bar cones it will introduce a pitch moment as a result of the laminates being acted upon by the thrust/drag component. The blades could be extrememly eratic in flight as a result. The solid aluminium hub bar reduces this torsional twisting moment of the blades during each cycle... this is a good thing.
Anyway, good topic, don't stop thinking outside the box.. just bare in mind that any good idea that we come up with has usually been tried in some form or another before... but certainly worth looking at again if the reasons are good enough and the technology is there to support it.
Cheers
Paul